LeeteLeeteAI · IoT
← Back to cases
Smart ManufacturingA plastic mold factory (≈60 employees) · Huizhou

Predictive maintenance for a mold factory: from fix-after-break to early warning

-50%
Unplanned downtime
-35%
Maintenance costs
+20%
Equipment lifespan
7×24
Real-time monitoring

Client Profile

Industry
Plastic mold manufacturing
Scale
≈60 staff · 20 key machines
Current
Reactive repair, veteran-based upkeep
Goal
Fewer sudden stoppages

Pain Points

1

Sudden failures halt production

One injection machine down stops the whole line, costing tens of thousands.

2

Maintenance depends on veterans

Only a few senior workers know machine health, and that knowledge walks when they leave.

3

Rough upkeep plans

Fixed-interval upkeep both over- and under-serves equipment.

Live Demo

Live demo · Predictive maintenance
Ready
Input
Real-time vibration / temperature / current from 20 machines
Consolelogs · stdout
$ 初始化演示管线…

How We Built It

01

Sensor data collection

Vibration, temperature and current sensors on key equipment stream real-time data.

02

Failure prediction

Models detect degradation trends and warn before failure.

03

Smart upkeep plans

Dynamic maintenance and spare-part reminders based on actual condition.

Not betting on one AI — combining the right few

For a real business scenario, we don't lock in a single technical path up front. We evaluate candidate paths on the same benchmark, then design a hybrid so each path does what it's best at.

General LLM API

Public-cloud models such as GPT-4o / Qwen / DeepSeek

  • ✓Out-of-the-box, minimal integration cost, cheap to start
  • ✕Limited generalization to vertical domains, unstable field-level accuracy, separate compliance design
Best for cold start and quick validation

Industry fine-tuned model

Domain fine-tuning of open-source models on industry data

  • ✓Grasps industry semantics, much higher accuracy, private deployment
  • ✕Needs labeled data plus ongoing training and upkeep
Best as the primary path for high-frequency traffic

RAG + rule engine

Retrieval-augmented knowledge plus business rule checks

  • ✓Highly targeted, explainable, best latency and cost
  • ✕Requires continuous data-loop investment
Best for fallback and high-certainty scenarios

Fusion, not selection

What we deliver is not a single model but a fused pipeline of primary path + semantic correction + graceful fallback: routine cases are handled by the industry model in seconds; low-confidence fields are re-understood by an LLM; on service anomalies the system degrades to a general API and flags manual review — achieving accuracy, cost, latency and controllability at once.

An explainable, degradable, evolvable AI pipeline

We treat AI engineering as a pipeline, not a black box: every step has clear responsibilities, inputs/outputs and fallbacks. The five-step pipeline plus four-layer architecture below is the technical skeleton.

L1

Ingestion & access layer

Multi-channel access with unified auth, idempotency and masking

Business APIsMobile / mini-programsFile upload / scanningAPI gateway · masking
L2

AI inference layer

Multi-path inference plus a confidence router switching by features

Industry fine-tuned modelMultimodal LLMRAG retrievalConfidence routing
L3

Business orchestration layer

Connecting results to real business flows with rule checks and closure

Business rule checksEntity / master-data matchingAmount / logic closureManual review tickets
L4

Data loop layer

Every online error flows back; models iterate monthly

Sample warehouseOnline labeling & error recallMonthly incremental fine-tuningDrift monitoring & alerts

Tech Stack

FastAPIvLLMLangChainRAGQwenGPT-4oTritonKubernetesPostgreSQLRedisMilvusDocker

Delivery Process

1

Equipment assessment

Ranked 20 machines and set monitoring priorities.

2

Data collection

Deployed sensors and edge gateways to build baseline data.

3

Training

Trained degradation and failure-prediction models.

4

Pilot

Validated warning accuracy on 3 key machines.

5

Rollout

Covered all equipment with a maintenance loop.

Before vs After

MetricBeforeAfter
Unplanned downtime6/month3/month
Loss per stoppage≈¥30k≈¥12k
Overall equipment effectiveness71%82%

“Now my phone warns me before a machine breaks, so we no longer get called back at midnight.”

— Mr. Zhao · Equipment Manager · mold factory

Where It Fits

Equipment-intensive plants such as injection, stamping and machining
Health monitoring for critical machines
Smart spare-part and upkeep management

Related Cases